Reviewing Policy

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. Peer review is an essential component of formal scholarly communication. Authors who wish to contribute to publications have an obligation to do a fair share of reviewing.

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Peer review is the major measure of quality assessment for any academic publication. Our Journals/ academic publications follow a single-blinded peer review process. Experts in the relevant fields, analyses the scholarly work from every perception, including its writing, the accuracy of its technical content, its documentation, and its impact on and implication to the discipline. Submitted manuscripts have to be examined by reviewers and editorial board. Manuscript may be submitted to editorial board for re-examination, if necessary. Editor should intimate the author about the acceptance or rejection of the paper preferably within 2 weeks of submission. The authors should be informed of reviewer’s comments about the manuscript for the necessary changes. Depending on reviewer commentary and recommendations, manuscripts should be sent back to authors for revision. After the editor receives the revised manuscript, it has to be assigned to the reviewer(s) once again, for approval of changes. But the final decision to publish is made by the Editor-in-Chief.